Catherine ‘Kate’ O'Sullivan1843–
- Name
- Catherine ‘Kate’ O'Sullivan
- Given names
- Catherine
- Nickname
- Kate
- Surname
- O'Sullivan
Birth | 1843 28 32 |
Baptism | 11 July 1843 |
Birth of a sibling | Francis O'Sullivan 1845 (Age 2 years) |
Baptism of a sibling | Francis O'Sullivan 7 October 1845 (Age 2 years) |
Birth of a brother | Michael O'Sullivan 1849 (Age 6 years) |
Baptism of a brother | Michael O'Sullivan 31 December 1849 (Age 6 years) |
Birth of a brother | Daniel O'Sullivan 31 January 1852 (Age 9 years) |
Baptism of a brother | Daniel O'Sullivan 1 February 1852 (Age 9 years) Address: Denmark Street, Limerick City Religion: RC |
Birth of a brother | Thomas O'Sullivan 1854 (Age 11 years) |
Baptism of a brother | Thomas O'Sullivan 9 December 1854 (Age 11 years) |
Marriage of a sibling | Daniel O'Sullivan — Bridget O'Halloran — View this family Type: Religious marriage 4 February 1879 (Age 36 years) Husband: 26 Wife: 18Address: Catherine St
Limerick
Witnesses: John Gabbett
Maggie Kirby |
Death of a brother | Daniel O'Sullivan Type: Y 1928 (Age 85 years) |
Death | Type: Y yes |
Family with parents |
father |
Daniel O'Sullivan Birth: between 1815 and 1816 25 18 Death: |
mother |
Mary Scanlon Birth: 1811 Death: |
elder brother |
John O'Sullivan Birth: 1837 22 26 Death: |
3 years elder brother |
Jeremiah O'Sullivan Birth: 1839 24 28 — Limerick Death: |
5 years herself |
Catherine ‘Kate’ O'Sullivan Birth: 1843 28 32 Death: |
3 years younger sibling |
Francis O'Sullivan Birth: 1845 30 34 Death: |
5 years younger brother |
Michael O'Sullivan Birth: 1849 34 38 Death: |
3 years younger brother |
|
3 years younger brother |
Thomas O'Sullivan Birth: 1854 39 43 — Limerick Death: |
Note | (Family Lore) Did Kate scandalously marry her brother, Daniel's, father-in-law, O'Halloran??
There were some family issues between Kate and Daniel/Brigid
She was christened Catherine.
In the 1901 census, she is living with her parents, Daniel and Bridget (both aged 90) in Little Frederick (O'Curry) Street. She was aged 46 in 1901. Based on this, it is fairly clear that both parents overstated their ages !
By the 1911 census, she was living on her own across the street
in number 5 and her age was more correctly noted as being 68 |